Model comparison
GPT-5 mini vs GPT-4o mini
Verified pricing, context windows and real-workload costs for both models — computed from official provider rates as of 2026-08-26.
Cheaper input
GPT-4o mini
$0.15 /1M in
Cheaper output
GPT-4o mini
$0.60 /1M out
Bigger context
GPT-5 mini
400K tokens
Head to head
| Spec | GPT-5 mini | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.25 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.025 | $0.075 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $0.60 |
| Context window | 400K | 128K |
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Price verified | 2026-08-26 | 2026-08-26 |
Monthly cost at three real workloads
| Workload | GPT-5 mini | GPT-4o mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Side-project chatbot 30K req · 2,000 in / 500 out · 40% cached | $39.60/mo | $16.20/mo | GPT-4o mini |
| Coding agent 500K req · 12,000 in / 1,500 out · 70% cached | $2,055/mo | $1,035/mo | GPT-4o mini |
| Bulk extraction 2,000K req · 800 in / 120 out · 20% cached | $808.00/mo | $360.00/mo | GPT-4o mini |
Computed from list prices verified 2026-08-26. Cache savings blend normal and cached input rates by the hit rate; models without published cached rates use the base input price. Adjust every parameter yourself on the API Cost Calculator.
Pick GPT-5 mini if…
- You prefer its $0.25 input rate for read-heavy workloads.
- You need the larger 400K context window.
- You run repeat-context workloads — cached input at $0.025 per 1M is the better deal.
Pick GPT-4o mini if…
- You generate long outputs — $0.60 per 1M output vs $2.00 adds up fast.
- Its 128K window covers your typical request with headroom.
- You want cheaper total spend at your exact volumes — verify with the calculator above.
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 mini cheaper than GPT-4o mini?
GPT-4o mini is cheaper on input at $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $0.25 — input pricing is 1.7× more expensive. On output, GPT-4o mini wins at $0.60 vs $2.00. At a balanced workload (100K requests, 2K in / 500 out), GPT-4o mini runs $60.00/mo vs $150.00/mo — a 2.5× difference.
GPT-5 mini vs GPT-4o mini: which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5 mini, with 400K tokens vs 128K — 3.1× more room. Filling GPT-5 mini's window once costs $0.100 at list price, vs $0.019 for the smaller window.
Should I switch from GPT-5 mini to GPT-4o mini?
Switch if your bottleneck matches GPT-4o mini's strengths: its 128K context fits your documents and cheaper output tokens ($0.60 vs $2.00). Stay on GPT-5 mini if your workload already fits its limits. Test both with your real token counts before committing.
Keep comparing
- GPT-5 vs Claude Opus 5
- GPT-5 mini vs Claude Sonnet 5
- GPT-5 nano vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- GPT-5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
- Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5 mini
- Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
- GPT-5 vs GPT-5 mini
Or measure your real usage with the AI Token Counter and browse all rates on the Pricing Comparison.